I am done preparing most of my teaching materials. I am now reflecting on how I normally go about weaving materials and strategies to make for an interesting interaction with the students. Whenever I introduce a new topic, the session usually starts with a discussion of what the topic is, what is it all about, taking every opportunity to allow the students to connect it with what they know previously and to point out how they can possibly benefit from learning it.
I then proceed to discuss the concepts, using the chalkboard, overhead transparencies and/or slide presentation. I make handouts available to the students so they can focus on listening to the discussion and minimize note-taking. During the discussion, I throw questions of significance to the students, processing whatever their answers are so I can emphasize what I need to emphasize. A teacher needs good questioning and processing skills here.
After presenting and discussing illustrative examples, showing how a problem is approached and solved, I give the students the opportunity to the same with other problems. I ask them to work on similar problems and call them to present and discuss their solutions in front of the class. This helps the students gain confidence.
For practice, I also give them problems to solve with a partner (pairwork) in class and/or assignments which they will solve individually or with a partner outside the classroom. Sometimes, I also ask them to do online practice exercises, which provide appropriate feedback on the answers they give. Each of these may or may not be included in the computation of their grades. The discussion of the solutions to these problems in class is imperative. This ensures that the students make the most out of every opportunity to learn.
Friday, March 23, 2007
What Happens In An Action Research?
Action research is usually conducted following a cyclical or spiral process which generally alternates between action and critical reflection.
MacIsaac (1995) presents the process as spiral: (1) Plan > (2) Action > (3) Observe > (4) Reflect > (1) Revised Plan >...
Here's another presentation of action research as a spiral process: (1) Assess need for a change or action > (2) Implement the change or action > (3) Study the results > (4) Rethink the need, the change and the results > (1) Reassess >...
Susman (1983) thinks of the process as cyclical: (1) Diagnosing (Identifying or defining a problem) > (2) Action Planning (Considering alternative courses of action) > (3) Taking Action (Selecting a course of action) > (4) Evaluating (Studying the consequences of an action) > (5) Specifying Learning (Identifying general findings) > (1) Diagnosing >... and so does Elliott (in Hopkins, 1993): (1) The Reconnaissance and General Plan > (2) The Action > Monitoring the implementation > (3) Reflection and Revision > (1) Another reconnaissance >...
Here's another (*): (1) Identify an area of practice to be investigated > (2) Imagine a solution > (3) Implement the solution > (4) Evaluate the solution > (5) Change practice in light of the evaluation > (1) New area of investigation >...
I also encountered some models presenting the phases of action research in a way similar to traditional research:
MacIsaac (1995) presents the process as spiral: (1) Plan > (2) Action > (3) Observe > (4) Reflect > (1) Revised Plan >...
Here's another presentation of action research as a spiral process: (1) Assess need for a change or action > (2) Implement the change or action > (3) Study the results > (4) Rethink the need, the change and the results > (1) Reassess >...
Susman (1983) thinks of the process as cyclical: (1) Diagnosing (Identifying or defining a problem) > (2) Action Planning (Considering alternative courses of action) > (3) Taking Action (Selecting a course of action) > (4) Evaluating (Studying the consequences of an action) > (5) Specifying Learning (Identifying general findings) > (1) Diagnosing >... and so does Elliott (in Hopkins, 1993): (1) The Reconnaissance and General Plan > (2) The Action > Monitoring the implementation > (3) Reflection and Revision > (1) Another reconnaissance >...
Here's another (*): (1) Identify an area of practice to be investigated > (2) Imagine a solution > (3) Implement the solution > (4) Evaluate the solution > (5) Change practice in light of the evaluation > (1) New area of investigation >...
I also encountered some models presenting the phases of action research in a way similar to traditional research:
- Problem Identification > Plan of Action > Data Collection > Analysis of Data > Plan for Future Action
- Identify an area of concern > Use data to assess your practice > Develop a research question > Work with a critical friend > Focus on action > Modify your question as necessary > Validate your findings > Draw conclusions > Record and share your project
- Decide on a focus > Develop a plan to gain insights > Analyze the data by looking for patterns, or themes across the evidence > Report on what you have learned (to your colleagues, to parents, at conferences, in journals)
Saturday, March 17, 2007
What Is Action Research?
There are many definitions, which essentially describe action research either as:
As a type of research/study/inquiry
NCREL describes action research as “inquiry or research in the context of focused efforts to improve the quality of an organization and its performance.” Ebbutt defines action research as “the systematic study of attempts to improve educational practice by groups of participants by means of their own practical actions and by means of their own reflection upon the effects of those actions.” Kemmis describes it as “a form of self-reflective inquiry undertaken by participants in social situations (including educational) in order to improve the rationality and justice of (a) their own social (or educational) practices, (b) their understanding of these practices, and (c) the situations in which the practices are carried out.” To put it plainly, action research in education is “a study conducted by colleagues in a school setting on the results of their activities to improve instruction” (Glickman, 1992). It is just a way of saying “let us study what is happening in our school and decide how to make it a better place (Calhoun, 1994).”
As a process
Kurt Lewin (1947), identified as the father of action research, describes it as “a three-step spiral process of (1) planning, which involves reconnaissance; (2) taking actions; and (3) fact-finding about the results of the action.” Corey (1953) defines action research as “the process by which practitioners attempt to study their problems scientifically in order to guide, correct, and evaluate their decisions and actions.” It refers to “a practical way of looking at your own work to check that it is as you would like it to be (McNiff, 1997). To put it simply, action research is a process in which participants examine their own educational practice using the techniques of research.
As a process, it has been described as emergent, since it takes shape as understanding increases, iterative, converging towards a better understanding of what happens, participative or collaborative, reflective, and qualitative.
What is it not?
Action research is not “researching” about an interesting topic. It is not about finding out why we are doing certain things but more of finding out how we can make doing them better. It is basically about changing, to have a better impact on students and their learning. It is about teachers working to improve their skills and strategies. It is more of the study of the practical, rather than the theoretical questions we encounter in our teaching practice.
- a type of research/study/inquiry or as
- a process
As a type of research/study/inquiry
NCREL describes action research as “inquiry or research in the context of focused efforts to improve the quality of an organization and its performance.” Ebbutt defines action research as “the systematic study of attempts to improve educational practice by groups of participants by means of their own practical actions and by means of their own reflection upon the effects of those actions.” Kemmis describes it as “a form of self-reflective inquiry undertaken by participants in social situations (including educational) in order to improve the rationality and justice of (a) their own social (or educational) practices, (b) their understanding of these practices, and (c) the situations in which the practices are carried out.” To put it plainly, action research in education is “a study conducted by colleagues in a school setting on the results of their activities to improve instruction” (Glickman, 1992). It is just a way of saying “let us study what is happening in our school and decide how to make it a better place (Calhoun, 1994).”
As a process
Kurt Lewin (1947), identified as the father of action research, describes it as “a three-step spiral process of (1) planning, which involves reconnaissance; (2) taking actions; and (3) fact-finding about the results of the action.” Corey (1953) defines action research as “the process by which practitioners attempt to study their problems scientifically in order to guide, correct, and evaluate their decisions and actions.” It refers to “a practical way of looking at your own work to check that it is as you would like it to be (McNiff, 1997). To put it simply, action research is a process in which participants examine their own educational practice using the techniques of research.
As a process, it has been described as emergent, since it takes shape as understanding increases, iterative, converging towards a better understanding of what happens, participative or collaborative, reflective, and qualitative.
What is it not?
Action research is not “researching” about an interesting topic. It is not about finding out why we are doing certain things but more of finding out how we can make doing them better. It is basically about changing, to have a better impact on students and their learning. It is about teachers working to improve their skills and strategies. It is more of the study of the practical, rather than the theoretical questions we encounter in our teaching practice.
Monday, March 12, 2007
BMAT2 Course Materials
My course materials in BMAT2 (Mathematics of Investment) is more complete than the others because, whenever I take an overload, I am almost always given this subject. So over the years, I have accumulated materials not only for handouts, problem sets, quizzes, and major examinations but also actual examples of promissory notes, amortization tables, print advertisements from which amortization problems arise, and stock certificates. I have also developed a collection of browser-based, JavaScript routines which acts like a calculator and allows a user to get values like F, P, S, A, R, OB by simply inputting the required values.
Here's my list of topics:
So my current work in BMAT2 consists of converting the documents to OpenOffice.org formats. Once done with the conversion, I will then look at my Discrete Mathematics and Trigonometry materials.
Here's my list of topics:
- Module 1 - Simple Interest and Discount Interest
- Module 2 - Compound Interest, Comparing Rates, Equation of Values, and Varying Interest
- Module 3 - Simple Annuities (Ordinary Annuity, Annuity Due, Deferred Annuity)
- Module 4 - Amortization and Sinking Funds
- Module 5 - Stocks and Bonds
So my current work in BMAT2 consists of converting the documents to OpenOffice.org formats. Once done with the conversion, I will then look at my Discrete Mathematics and Trigonometry materials.
Sunday, March 11, 2007
Slam Dunk
I have heard this anime before and have even seen action figures and school supplies depicting the different characters. But it was only recently, when I viewed several episodes, that I realized how funny this anime is. Ally McBeal kind of funny. It makes use of exaggeration in exhibiting certain emotions. I am amused that all my five kids smile at funny scenes at the same time, notwithstanding the fact that they have to read subtitles since the audio language is Japanese.
The first few episodes introduce two very different personalities -- Hanamichi Sakuragi and Kaede Rukawa. Sakuragi is pure, raw power. Brash. Unpredictable. Extrovert. On the other hand, Rukawa personifies finesse. He is reserved. Introvert.
I cannot help but place myself in relation to these two characters. Am I an extrovert? Introvert? Well, I can say I am neither. I can be very reserved in one situation and be all over the place in another. And I think it is good that I am like that.
The first few episodes introduce two very different personalities -- Hanamichi Sakuragi and Kaede Rukawa. Sakuragi is pure, raw power. Brash. Unpredictable. Extrovert. On the other hand, Rukawa personifies finesse. He is reserved. Introvert.
I cannot help but place myself in relation to these two characters. Am I an extrovert? Introvert? Well, I can say I am neither. I can be very reserved in one situation and be all over the place in another. And I think it is good that I am like that.
Action!
One of the things I plan to do when I return to full-time teaching is to do research, specifically action research. I am biased towards action research, very likely because I consider myself a practical person. I want to find out how I can make things related to my work better, and action research is most suited for this purpose.
Before embarking on actual researching, I need to consolidate concepts and processes to make my activities sound and systematic. Here are some questions, the answers to which should make for a formal outlining of important understanding:
Before embarking on actual researching, I need to consolidate concepts and processes to make my activities sound and systematic. Here are some questions, the answers to which should make for a formal outlining of important understanding:
- What is action research? (What are the various definitions?)
- How is it different from other types of research? (What are the strengths and the weaknesses?)
- What happens in an action research? (What are the steps in the process?)
- What are the benefits of action research? (What are the effects on the students, the teachers, the staff, and the College?)
- What are possible problems? (What are the characteristics of "good" problems?)
- How does one collect data properly? (And first, which data to collect?)
- What are the best ways of presenting data?
- How does one go about interpreting data?
- How does one use data to plot future actions? (When does reflection occur?)
Wednesday, March 7, 2007
ALGEBRA Course Materials
I am done with the basic arrangement of my course materials in ALGEBRA. In the past week, I have been looking at what I have, arranging them, and converting some to OpenOffice.org Writer. I am still doing some conversions but the list of topics and materials available is fairly complete. For the topics, I have:
As for the materials, I currently have handouts, problem set items, and lots of multiple choice type questions (great for Moodle). I also have some old major examinations and worked out exercises from which I can build online or written exercises/examinations. I placed them on four new clear file folders.
And by the way, I also checked the locker they assigned to me in the SMS Faculty Room. I lost mine when they renovated the place and I have not had anything there since the Summer of 2003. This afternoon, I deposited some things and placed a lock. And my goodness, the trip gave me that butterfly-in-the-stomach feeling.
- Module 1 - The Real Numbers, Algebraic Expressions, Special Products
- Module 2 - Factoring Polynomials, Algebraic Fractions, Rational Exponents and Radicals
- Module 3 - Linear Equations in One Variable, Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables
- Module 4 - Quadratic Equations, Linear Inequalities in One Variable
As for the materials, I currently have handouts, problem set items, and lots of multiple choice type questions (great for Moodle). I also have some old major examinations and worked out exercises from which I can build online or written exercises/examinations. I placed them on four new clear file folders.
And by the way, I also checked the locker they assigned to me in the SMS Faculty Room. I lost mine when they renovated the place and I have not had anything there since the Summer of 2003. This afternoon, I deposited some things and placed a lock. And my goodness, the trip gave me that butterfly-in-the-stomach feeling.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)